A Measure for the Protection of Public Receivable: Guarantee According to the Law No. 6183
A Measure for the Protection of Public Receivable: Guarantee According to the Law No. 6183
Yükleniyor...
Abstract
6183 sayılı Kanunda kamu alacağı tahsilini garanti altına almayıamaçlayan güvence önlemleri bulunmaktadır. Henüz tarh ve tahakkuk etmemişolmasına rağmen alacağı güvenceye bağlayabilen koruma önlemlerinden birisi teminat kurumudur. Mahkeme kararına ihtiyaç duyulmadan idari işlem yoluyla başvurulabilen bir önlem olan teminat istemi kamu borçlusunun teminat gösterme veya göstermeme tutumuna göre farklı hukuki sonuçlara vesile olmaktadır. Çalışmamızda kendine özgü cebri takip ve tahsil süreci işletebilme olanağı sağlayabilen 6183 sayılı Kanun m.9-12 arasında düzenlenmiş teminat kurumunun hukuki analiz ve tahlili yapılmaktadır.
There are preventive regulations aimed at protecting the collection ofpublic receivables in Law No. 6183. On of the safeguards that can tie it to theassurance that it will receive, even though it has not yet been accrued orfinalized, is tha guarantee institution. Collateral request, which is a measurethat can be applied thrugh administrative prooceedings without the need for a court decision has different legal consequences according to the attiutde of thepublic deptor th Show colleteral or not. In our study, the legal analysis andanalysis of the collateral institution arranged between m.9-12 of Law Noç 6183,which can alsı provide the opporunity to operate its own forced follow-up andcollection process, is carried out.
There are preventive regulations aimed at protecting the collection ofpublic receivables in Law No. 6183. On of the safeguards that can tie it to theassurance that it will receive, even though it has not yet been accrued orfinalized, is tha guarantee institution. Collateral request, which is a measurethat can be applied thrugh administrative prooceedings without the need for a court decision has different legal consequences according to the attiutde of thepublic deptor th Show colleteral or not. In our study, the legal analysis andanalysis of the collateral institution arranged between m.9-12 of Law Noç 6183,which can alsı provide the opporunity to operate its own forced follow-up andcollection process, is carried out.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
3
Volume
22
Issue
2
Start Page
857
End Page
904
Collections
Yükleniyor...
